Taste Of Capital
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • Stock
Home Politics ‘Long overdue’: Senate Republicans ram through Trump’s clawback package with cuts to foreign aid, NPR
Politics

‘Long overdue’: Senate Republicans ram through Trump’s clawback package with cuts to foreign aid, NPR

by admin July 17, 2025
July 17, 2025

Senate Republicans blasted through Democratic and internal opposition to pass President Donald Trump’s multibillion-dollar clawback package early Thursday morning.

The final vote tally was 51-48, with Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska joining every Democrat in voting against it. The package will now be sent to the House, which has until Friday to pass it. 

The $9 billion rescissions bill tees up cuts to ‘woke’ spending on foreign aid programs and NPR and PBS that Congress previously approved. Republicans have pitched the bill as building on their quest to root out waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that it was a mission shared by the GOP and Trump, whose Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) identified many of the cuts included in the package.  

‘I appreciate all the work the administration has done in identifying wasteful spending,’ Thune said. ‘And now it’s time for the Senate to do its part to cut some of that waste out of the budget. It’s a small but important step toward fiscal sanity that we all should be able to agree is long overdue.’

The president’s rescissions package proposed cutting just shy of $8 billion from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and over $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the government-backed funding arm for NPR and PBS.

It’s likely the first of many to come from the White House.

Unlike the previous procedural votes, Vice President JD Vance was not needed to break a tie. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., voted against the preceding procedural votes to advance the package on Tuesday night, but ultimately backed the bill. 

It now heads to the House, where Republicans have warned the Senate to not make changes to the package. But just like during the budget reconciliation process earlier this month, the warnings from House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and fiscal hawks fell on deaf ears in the upper chamber.

The Senate GOP’s version of the bill is indeed smaller, by about $400 million, after Senate leaders agreed to make a carveout that spared international Bush-era HIV and AIDS prevention funding.

Other attempts were made during a marathon vote-a-rama process to make changes to the bill, but none were able to surmount the 60-vote threshold in the upper chamber.

Senate Democrats tried to kneecap the bill with amendments that targeted what they argued were cuts that would diminish emergency alerts for extreme weather and disasters, erode America’s and isolate rural Americans by creating news deserts with cuts to public broadcasting, among others.

‘Why are we talking about cutting off emergency alerts,’ Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash, said. ‘That’s 1,000 times these stations were warned to tell people that their lives were in danger.’

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, contended that much more was at stake than the spending cuts.

The Washington Democrat charged that lawmakers were also ‘voting on how the Senate is going to spend the rest of this year, are we just going to do rescission after rescission, because we know Russ Vought is just itching to send us more.’

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., rebuked Democrats’ assertions against the bill, and pitched the legislation as a way for lawmakers to ‘course-correct’ wasteful spending that shouldn’t have ever been green-lit.

He told Fox News Digital that what Democrats want to do is ‘keep as much of this money for their woke pet projects as they can.’ 

‘They were able to do that for four years,’ he said. ‘That’s how you got to, you know, DEIs in Burma and Guatemalan sex changes and voter ID in Haiti, which is ironic, because Democrats don’t support voter ID here, but they’re willing to pay it for it in another country.’

Fox News Digital’s Bradford Betz contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Big government, big problems: Public corruption highest in places with large bureaucracies, report says
next post
Oracle stock price has surged, but beware of key risks

Related Posts

Newsom taunts Trump with series of comments about president’s ties...

July 17, 2025

Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or...

July 17, 2025

Republicans fixated on Epstein are getting ‘duped’ by Democrats, Trump...

July 17, 2025

LEE ZELDIN: Trump’s EPA clearing the regulatory path for America...

July 17, 2025

Senate Republicans, do the right thing on Trump’s unfit judicial...

July 17, 2025

Ignore outrageous attacks on Trump’s DOJ champion. He belongs on...

July 17, 2025

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Stock News

    • Volvo posts Q2 operating loss; turnaround plan ‘fully on track’, says CEO

      July 17, 2025
    • Kolhapuri vs couture: How Prada’s sandal sparked a cultural row in India

      July 17, 2025
    • Asian stocks end mostly higher on Thursday: Nikkei up 0.60%, Kospi up 0.2%

      July 17, 2025
    • PepsiCo shares rise as Q2 revenue beats expectations despite weak US demand, soft volumes

      July 17, 2025
    • Russia’s bad loan crisis: is bailout inevitable by next year?

      July 17, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: TasteOfCapital.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.
    Copyright © 2025 TasteOfCapital.com All Rights Reserved.

    Taste Of Capital
    • Politics
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Stock